CO129-332 - Public Offices & Others - 1905 — Page 231

Kagram Filegrafla

I replied 4

in Deer gtt

they desparde (N° 349) in the 15th Subsequently

If he graphed & you. in Dec 19h. asking

you

4m 65 scopand action with regard wall the cantines specifiol

my first filegram

except Brazil, on

wel

come

4.

Flagran

(

their

tot. re-considered,

The reas an

ities

for that

the last session ftu

Sugar

Comincission astain

Countries whe

adjudicated

приа

арт

fromanced 6

ما

al.

h. bounty-giving but H..

Look

tax appealed against t

decisions in

tie

229

the countries, exud

Jall Brazil, speisfied

sxccept Deazel (

first emlos me despatch No 347K

ground that case of

no

M

the

the

the

2.contracting

State it was not sufficient

to show that the surtat exceeded the limits

fixed by the Carvention

but that it was

nas necessary

also to shew that

Such surtat resulted

in

to result in,

bounty.

likely

The consideration If there appeals stands